Related%20passage for Yoma 113:4

הניחא למאן דאמר לא הוי היקש אלא למאן דאמר הוי היקש מאי איכא למימר

- The inference here came from the subject itself for which inference was made, together with another, thus cannot be considered inference by analogy.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the primary analogy the main law prescribing upward and downward sprinklings is definitely taught in the Biblical text, both in the case of the bullock and the he-goat , it is only their number that is inferred from one another. In such a case the primary analogy may be made the basis for a further analogy. It is only when the very law itself is mentioned in one case only and then inferred through analogy for the other that no further inference by analogy may be made. If e.g., no reference had been made in the Biblical text to any upward or downward sprinkling, such regulation being based on inference from one to the other, it would then be wrong to endeavour to derive another law by analogy from the first law inferred by analogy.');">³</span>

Explore related%20passage for Yoma 113:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.